[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <873467mqz7.fsf@wotan.olymp>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 13:53:48 +0000
From: Luis Henriques <luis@...lia.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] fuse: Uninitialized variable in fuse_epoch_work()
On Fri, Nov 21 2025, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The "fm" pointer is either valid or uninitialized so checking for NULL
> doesn't work. Check the "inode" pointer instead.
Hmm? Why do you say 'fm' isn't initialised? That's what fuse_ilookup()
is doing, isn't it?
Cheers,
--
Luís
> Fixes: 64becd224ff9 ("fuse: new work queue to invalidate dentries from old epochs")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> ---
> fs/fuse/dir.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dir.c b/fs/fuse/dir.c
> index 761f4a14dc95..ec5042b47abb 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c
> @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ void fuse_epoch_work(struct work_struct *work)
> inode = fuse_ilookup(fc, FUSE_ROOT_ID, &fm);
> iput(inode);
>
> - if (fm) {
> + if (inode) {
> /* Remove all possible active references to cached inodes */
> shrink_dcache_sb(fm->sb);
> } else
> --
> 2.51.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists