[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aSCOZCJ2rSw7LAvE@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 11:08:04 -0500
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: ming.qian@....nxp.com
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl, nicolas@...fresne.ca,
benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
sebastian.fricke@...labora.com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com, linux-imx@....com,
l.stach@...gutronix.de, peng.fan@....com, eagle.zhou@....com,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] media: verisilicon: Avoid G2 bus error while
decoding H.264 and HEVC
On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 04:19:09PM +0800, ming.qian@....nxp.com wrote:
> From: Ming Qian <ming.qian@....nxp.com>
>
> For the i.MX8MQ platform, there is a hardware limitation: the g1 VPU and
> g2 VPU cannot decode simultaneously; otherwise, it will cause below bus
> error and produce corrupted pictures, even led to system hang.
>
> [ 110.527986] hantro-vpu 38310000.video-codec: frame decode timed out.
> [ 110.583517] hantro-vpu 38310000.video-codec: bus error detected.
>
> Therefore, it is necessary to ensure that g1 and g2 operate alternately.
> Then this allows for successful multi-instance decoding of H.264 and HEVC.
>
> Fixes: cb5dd5a0fa518 ("media: hantro: Introduce G2/HEVC decoder")
> Signed-off-by: Ming Qian <ming.qian@....nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro.h | 1 +
> .../media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../media/platform/verisilicon/imx8m_vpu_hw.c | 4 +++
> 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
>
...
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> #include <media/v4l2-event.h>
> #include <media/v4l2-mem2mem.h>
> #include <media/videobuf2-core.h>
> @@ -93,6 +94,9 @@ static void hantro_job_finish(struct hantro_dev *vpu,
>
> clk_bulk_disable(vpu->variant->num_clocks, vpu->clocks);
>
> + if (vpu->variant->shared_resource)
> + atomic_cmpxchg(vpu->variant->shared_resource, 0, 1);
> +
> hantro_job_finish_no_pm(vpu, ctx, result);
> }
>
> @@ -166,12 +170,34 @@ void hantro_end_prepare_run(struct hantro_ctx *ctx)
> msecs_to_jiffies(2000));
> }
>
> +static int hantro_wait_shared_resource(struct hantro_dev *vpu)
> +{
> + u32 data;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!vpu->variant->shared_resource)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = read_poll_timeout(atomic_cmpxchg, data, data, 10, 300 * NSEC_PER_MSEC, false,
> + vpu->variant->shared_resource, 1, 0);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(vpu->dev, "Failed to wait shared resource\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
why not use a mutex?
mutex() lock here, unlock at hantro_job_finish(), if second instance
run to here, mutex() will block thread, until previous hantro_job_finish()
finish.
Frank
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static void device_run(void *priv)
> {
> struct hantro_ctx *ctx = priv;
> struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *src, *dst;
> int ret;
>
> + ret = hantro_wait_shared_resource(ctx->dev);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err_cancel_job;
> +
> src = hantro_get_src_buf(ctx);
> dst = hantro_get_dst_buf(ctx);
...
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists