lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aSC9pc8iusYxII5M@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 09:29:41 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ying chen <yc1082463@...il.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 7/7] workqueue: Process extra works in rescuer when
 there are no more to rescue

On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 10:57:20PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>
> 
> Make the rescuer process more work on the last pwq when there are no
> more to rescue for the whole workqueue to help the regular workers in
> case it is a temporary relief and to reduce relapse.
> 
> Also limit the number of extra works.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>

Is this based on some empirical case? Can you give a concrete example?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ