lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251121113138.9955cb18d9b6c7ce812d5c0a@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 11:31:38 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel-team@...a.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
 surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, jackmanb@...gle.com,
 hannes@...xchg.org, ziy@...dia.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David
 Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>, Oscar
 Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] page_alloc: allow migration of smaller hugepages
 during contig_alloc

On Fri, 21 Nov 2025 14:15:40 -0500 Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net> wrote:

> We presently skip regions with hugepages entirely when trying to do
> contiguous page allocation.  Instead, if hugepage migration is enabled,
> consider regions with hugepages smaller than the target contiguous
> allocation request as valid targets for allocation.

Why?  What benefit does this have to our users?

Some runtime testing results might be helpful?

> isolate_migrate_pages_block() already expects requests with hugepages
> to originate from alloc_contig, and hugetlb code also does a migratable
> check when isolating in folio_isolate_hugetlb().
> 
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>

A Link: here might be illuminating.

> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -6849,8 +6849,19 @@ static bool pfn_range_valid_contig(struct zone *z, unsigned long start_pfn,
>  		if (PageReserved(page))
>  			return false;
>  
> -		if (PageHuge(page))
> -			return false;
> +		if (PageHuge(page)) {
> +			unsigned int order;
> +
> +			if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_HUGEPAGE_MIGRATION))
> +				return false;
> +
> +			/* Don't consider moving same size/larger pages */

Comment says "what" (which was fairly obvious).  Please reveal "why".

> +			page = compound_head(page);
> +			order = compound_order(page);
> +			if ((order >= MAX_FOLIO_ORDER) ||
> +			    (nr_pages <= (1 << order)))
> +				return false;
> +		}
>  	}
>  	return true;
>  }


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ