[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0f9ed7ce-3839-4d2b-98b3-25cc4045aa22@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 08:46:39 +0530
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
CC: <mingo@...hat.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
<vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <yury.norov@...il.com>,
<maddy@...ux.ibm.com>, <srikar@...ux.ibm.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<pbonzini@...hat.com>, <seanjc@...gle.com>, <vschneid@...hat.com>,
<iii@...ux.ibm.com>, <huschle@...ux.ibm.com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
<dietmar.eggemann@....com>, <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/17] sched/core: Add support for nohz_full CPUs
Hello Shrikanth,
On 11/19/2025 6:14 PM, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> Enable tick on nohz full CPU when it is marked as paravirt.
> If there in no CFS/RT running there, disable the tick to save the power.
Wouldn't the task be pinned if it is running on a nohz CPU?
We don't push out pinned tasks so this seems unnecessary.
Am I missing something?
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists