[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86b0ce55-60f5-4bf4-84a8-6d612478baa3@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 12:29:42 +0800
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: "Yuezhang.Mo@...y.com" <Yuezhang.Mo@...y.com>,
"linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"syzbot+31b8fb02cb8a25bd5e78@...kaller.appspotmail.com"
<syzbot+31b8fb02cb8a25bd5e78@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] erofs: correct FSDAX detection
On 2025/11/21 12:12, Yuezhang.Mo@...y.com wrote:
> On November 17, 2025 19:57 Gao Xiang wrote:
>> The detection of the primary device is skipped incorrectly
>> if the multiple or flattened feature is enabled.
>>
>> It also fixes the FSDAX misdetection for non-block extra blobs.
>>
>> Fixes: c6993c4cb918 ("erofs: Fallback to normal access if DAX is not supported on extra device")
>> Reported-by: syzbot+31b8fb02cb8a25bd5e78@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/691af9f6.a70a0220.3124cb.0097.GAE@google.com
>> Cc: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@...y.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> fs/erofs/super.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/erofs/super.c b/fs/erofs/super.c
>> index f3f8d8c066e4..cd8ff98c2938 100644
>> --- a/fs/erofs/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/erofs/super.c
>> @@ -174,15 +174,15 @@ static int erofs_init_device(struct erofs_buf *buf, struct super_block *sb,
>> if (!erofs_is_fileio_mode(sbi)) {
>> dif->dax_dev = fs_dax_get_by_bdev(file_bdev(file),
>> &dif->dax_part_off, NULL, NULL);
>> - if (!dif->dax_dev && test_opt(&sbi->opt, DAX_ALWAYS)) {
>> - erofs_info(sb, "DAX unsupported by %s. Turning off DAX.",
>> - dif->path);
>> - clear_opt(&sbi->opt, DAX_ALWAYS);
>> - }
>> } else if (!S_ISREG(file_inode(file)->i_mode)) {
>> fput(file);
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> + if (!dif->dax_dev && test_opt(&sbi->opt, DAX_ALWAYS)) {
>> + erofs_info(sb, "DAX unsupported by %s. Turning off DAX.",
>> + dif->path);
>> + clear_opt(&sbi->opt, DAX_ALWAYS);
>> + }
>> dif->file = file;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -215,13 +215,13 @@ static int erofs_scan_devices(struct super_block *sb,
>> ondisk_extradevs, sbi->devs->extra_devices);
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> - if (!ondisk_extradevs) {
>> - if (test_opt(&sbi->opt, DAX_ALWAYS) && !sbi->dif0.dax_dev) {
>> - erofs_info(sb, "DAX unsupported by block device. Turning off DAX.");
>> - clear_opt(&sbi->opt, DAX_ALWAYS);
>> - }
>> - return 0;
>> +
>> + if (test_opt(&sbi->opt, DAX_ALWAYS) && !sbi->dif0.dax_dev) {
>> + erofs_info(sb, "DAX unsupported by block device. Turning off DAX.");
>> + clear_opt(&sbi->opt, DAX_ALWAYS);
>> }
>> + if (!ondisk_extradevs)
>> + return 0;
>
> Hi Gao Xiang,
>
> If using multiple devices, is there still file data on the primary device?
> If the primary device only contains metadata, the primary device does not need
> to support DAX.
Hi Yuezhang,
Currently we don't have a per-device/file fsdax selection
design/implementation.
If fsdax is on, for example, directory data arranged in the primary
device will go through fsdax path (but your case above is that the
primary device does not need to support fsdax.)
Anyway, in principle, we could make them work, but per-device FSDAX
needs a detailed design, I think we should restrict them on the
per-filesystem basis now.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
>
>>
>> if (!sbi->devs->extra_devices && !erofs_is_fscache_mode(sb))
>> sbi->devs->flatdev = true;
>> --
>> 2.43.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists