[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a59de9d-0512-445a-a051-5e98fd295f6b@molgen.mpg.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 09:59:54 +0100
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai@...as.com>
Cc: song@...nel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linan122@...wei.com, xni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] md/raid0: align bio to io_opt
Dear Kuai,
Thank you for your patches.
Am 21.11.25 um 06:14 schrieb Yu Kuai:
> The impact is not so significant for raid0 compared to raid5, however
> it's still more appropriate to issue IOs evenly to underlying disks.
Could you please elaborate, what the problem is, and also share your
benchmark results and test setups?
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai@...as.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid0.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid0.c b/drivers/md/raid0.c
> index 47aee1b1d4d1..332f413bcf51 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid0.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid0.c
> @@ -388,6 +388,8 @@ static int raid0_set_limits(struct mddev *mddev)
> err = mddev_stack_rdev_limits(mddev, &lim, MDDEV_STACK_INTEGRITY);
> if (err)
> return err;
> +
> + md_config_align_limits(mddev, &lim);
> return queue_limits_set(mddev->gendisk->queue, &lim);
> }
>
Kind regards,
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists