[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251121100315.316300-7-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 11:03:12 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Maulik Shah <quic_mkshah@...cinc.com>,
Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@...cinc.com>,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>,
Deepti Jaggi <quic_djaggi@...cinc.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: [PATCH v3 6/6] Documentation: power/cpuidle: Document the CPU system wakeup latency QoS
Let's document how the new CPU system wakeup latency QoS limit can be used
from user space, along with how the constraint is taken into account for
s2idle and cpuidle.
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
---
Changes in v3:
- Improved documentation.
- Updated commit message.
Changes in v2:
- New patch.
---
Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst | 9 +++++++++
Documentation/power/pm_qos_interface.rst | 9 +++++----
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst
index 0c090b076224..c39ad6ab99d9 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst
@@ -580,6 +580,15 @@ the given CPU as the upper limit for the exit latency of the idle states that
they are allowed to select for that CPU. They should never select any idle
states with exit latency beyond that limit.
+While the above CPU QoS constraints applies to CPU idle time management, user
+space may also request a CPU system wakeup latency QoS limit, via the
+`cpu_wakeup_latency` file. This QoS constraint is respected when selecting a
+suitable idle state for the CPUs, while entering the system-wide suspend-to-idle
+sleep state, but also to the regular CPU idle time management.
+
+Note that, the management of the `cpu_wakeup_latency` file works according to
+the 'cpu_dma_latency' file from user space point of view. Moreover, the unit
+is also microseconds.
Idle States Control Via Kernel Command Line
===========================================
diff --git a/Documentation/power/pm_qos_interface.rst b/Documentation/power/pm_qos_interface.rst
index 5019c79c7710..4c008e2202f0 100644
--- a/Documentation/power/pm_qos_interface.rst
+++ b/Documentation/power/pm_qos_interface.rst
@@ -55,7 +55,8 @@ int cpu_latency_qos_request_active(handle):
From user space:
-The infrastructure exposes one device node, /dev/cpu_dma_latency, for the CPU
+The infrastructure exposes two separate device nodes, /dev/cpu_dma_latency for
+the CPU latency QoS and /dev/cpu_wakeup_latency for the CPU system wakeup
latency QoS.
Only processes can register a PM QoS request. To provide for automatic
@@ -63,15 +64,15 @@ cleanup of a process, the interface requires the process to register its
parameter requests as follows.
To register the default PM QoS target for the CPU latency QoS, the process must
-open /dev/cpu_dma_latency.
+open /dev/cpu_dma_latency. To register a CPU system wakeup QoS limit, the
+process must open /dev/cpu_wakeup_latency.
As long as the device node is held open that process has a registered
request on the parameter.
To change the requested target value, the process needs to write an s32 value to
the open device node. Alternatively, it can write a hex string for the value
-using the 10 char long format e.g. "0x12345678". This translates to a
-cpu_latency_qos_update_request() call.
+using the 10 char long format e.g. "0x12345678".
To remove the user mode request for a target value simply close the device
node.
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists