[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251122144619.73fa991d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2025 14:46:19 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Matt Coster <matt.coster@...tec.com>
Cc: Frank Binns <frank.binns@...tec.com>, Alessio Belle
<alessio.belle@...tec.com>, Alexandru Dadu <alexandru.dadu@...tec.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard
<mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie
<airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/imagination: Document pvr_device.power member
Hi Matt,
On Fri, 21 Nov 2025 15:20:31 +0000 Matt Coster <matt.coster@...tec.com> wrote:
>
> Based on the build target indicated in the report, I tried (and failed)
> to reproduce the reported warning using:
>
> make W=1 htmldocs
>
> I was, however, able to get the reported warning (and verify that this
> patch clears it) using:
>
> scripts/kernel-doc -none drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_device.h
>
> Does anyone have any ideas why my invocation of htmldocs didn't seem to
> have the same effect? Is it just simply that the relevant doc comment
> isn't pulled into any of the rst docs; in which case how did the
> linux-next build catch this warning?
I just do "make htmldocs" on the final linux-next tree each day, so I
have no idea what makes a difference, sorry.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists