[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGudoHEsUV+fe4vY7G0FF3T_bki=Nh-QxmLk29+s6ySMqyf-Eg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2025 20:47:46 +0100
From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: brauner@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ns: pad refcount
On Sun, Nov 23, 2025 at 7:58 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/23, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> >
> > struct ns_common {
> > + struct {
> > + refcount_t __ns_ref; /* do not use directly */
> > + } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>
> Cough... stupid question. Why not just
>
> refcount_t __ns_ref ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>
> ? why do we need the anonymous struct?
>
This would merely align the offset of the field, with the rest
directly following.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists