linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] dt-bindings: display: add verisilicon,dc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ee1e4f94-ff9a-4227-b705-74a7eb806ff0@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 18:40:55 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
 David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Drew Fustini <fustini@...nel.org>,
 Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Fu Wei <wefu@...hat.com>,
 Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
 Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
 Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
 Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
 Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
 Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski@...sung.com>, Han Gao
 <rabenda.cn@...il.com>, Yao Zi <ziyao@...root.org>,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] dt-bindings: display: add verisilicon,dc

On 24/11/2025 16:25, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 在 2025-11-24星期一的 13:31 +0100，Krzysztof Kozlowski写道：
>> On 24/11/2025 13:20, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 01:08:00PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 24/11/2025 13:05, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't really get what the fuss is with the dual signoff,
>>>>> what's the
>>>>> point having both when they represent the same person? Pretty
>>>>> sure it
>>>>> was you (Krzysztof) and Arnd that told me not to both doing the
>>>>> double
>>>>> signoff.
>>>>
>>>> I do not object having or not having dual signed off HERE.
>>>>
>>>> I never said that. Just like I never said "From" has to be
>>>> changed.
>>>
>>> I didn't say you objected to both being there. *I* am saying that
>>> it is
>>
>> Ah, sure. Yes, if both identities work I would propose to skip second
>> SoB. But I also stopped objecting of having two identities listed, as
>> long as they are correct.
> 
> Well it's unfortunate that some policy now requires me to list the
> second identity.

No policy asked you...

> 
> Should I resend the whole patchset with the ISCAS mail?

You can, it probably would solve the issue, unless you change the
author, but why you cannot do what I asked at the beginning - set
correct order of SoBs, so the @icenowy.me being the last?


Best regards,
Krzysztof