[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aSSnWaDHK5Yyq_Ae@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 20:43:37 +0200
From: "andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com" <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@....com>
Cc: "idryomov@...il.com" <idryomov@...il.com>, Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>,
"justinstitt@...gle.com" <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
"llvm@...ts.linux.dev" <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>,
"ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"morbo@...gle.com" <morbo@...gle.com>,
"nathan@...nel.org" <nathan@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com" <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ceph: Amend checking to fix `make W=1` build
breakage
On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 05:47:04PM +0000, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-11-24 at 17:09 +0200, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 08:42:13PM +0000, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2025-11-10 at 21:43 +0200, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com wrote:
...
> > > I think we can take the patch as it. It looks good. Probably, it makes sense to
> > > take a deeper look in the code on our side.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@....com>
> >
> > Thanks, can this be applied? My builds are still broken.
>
> The patchset has been applied on testing branch already [1].
Thanks for the information. The Linux Next still has no that branch in.
I recommend to write Stephen a message to include your testing branch or
something like that into Linux Next, so it will get more test coverage.
> Ilya, when are we planning to send this patchset upstream?
> [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph-client.git
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists