linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ceph: Amend checking to fix `make W=1` build breakage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aSSq0K-YqjthuJAg@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 20:58:24 +0200
From: "andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com" <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@....com>
Cc: Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>,
	"justinstitt@...gle.com" <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
	"ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"llvm@...ts.linux.dev" <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"morbo@...gle.com" <morbo@...gle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"nathan@...nel.org" <nathan@...nel.org>,
	"idryomov@...il.com" <idryomov@...il.com>,
	"nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com" <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ceph: Amend checking to fix `make W=1` build
 breakage

On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 06:49:26PM +0000, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-11-24 at 20:43 +0200, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 05:47:04PM +0000, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2025-11-24 at 17:09 +0200, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 08:42:13PM +0000, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 2025-11-10 at 21:43 +0200, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com wrote:

...

> > > > > I think we can take the patch as it. It looks good. Probably, it makes sense to
> > > > > take a deeper look in the code on our side.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@....com>
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks, can this be applied? My builds are still broken.
> > > 
> > > The patchset has been applied on testing branch already [1].
> > 
> > Thanks for the information. The Linux Next still has no that branch in.
> > I recommend to write Stephen a message to include your testing branch or
> > something like that into Linux Next, so it will get more test coverage.
> 
> It's not my personal branch. :) It's the branch that receives all new patches
> for CephFS kernel client and, usually, it is used for internal testing by Ceph
> team.

Exactly, that's why my proposal. I would not recommend to do the same for
a (semi-)private branches.

> Ilya gathers all patches from there and sends it upstream. So, we need to
> ping Ilya. :)

> > > Ilya, when are we planning to send this patchset upstream?
> > 
> > > [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph-client.git  

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko