[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <efa2f4e7-97b7-465d-81e5-98d86975548f@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 03:40:28 +0530
From: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@....qualcomm.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Jessica Zhang <jesszhan0024@...il.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] drm/msm/a6xx: Retrieve gmu core range by index
On 11/22/2025 7:08 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 11/21/25 10:52 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>> Some GPUs like A612 doesn't use a named register range resource. This
>> is because the reg-name property is discouraged when there is just a
>> single resource.
>>
>> To address this, retrieve the 'gmu' register range by its index. It is
>> always guaranteed to be at index 0.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 14 ++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> index 5903cd891b49..9662201cd2e9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> @@ -2029,21 +2029,19 @@ static int cxpd_notifier_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void __iomem *a6xx_gmu_get_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> - const char *name, resource_size_t *start)
>> +static void __iomem *a6xx_gmu_get_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev, resource_size_t *start)
>
> Can we drop this and just use devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource()?
That's better. Nice.
-Akhil.
>
> Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists