linux-kernel - Re: [rft, PATCH v1 1/1] cpumask: Don't use "proxy" headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aSTfSkffTnTfR64-@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 00:42:18 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [rft, PATCH v1 1/1] cpumask: Don't use "proxy" headers

On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 04:17:51PM -0500, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 09:39:59PM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> > Not fully compile tested, might give some compilation errors

...

> > -#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> > -#include <linux/kernel.h>
> 
> I recall, removing kernel.h from cpumasks was a troublesome exercise
> back then. But it may be my false memory.

Yeah, there are several headers that are too tangled together.
At least it builds on my configurations on x86_64.

> Added this for testing in bitmap-for-next.

Thanks, let's see how it will go. But note that it might fall the builds in
some cases.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko