[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <pv56bl4p7lfflloocozxaeufd6udkk3jhehrtne65cidrvlfwn@wvrkw6mjmhwp>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 11:15:04 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>, Phong LE <ple@...libre.com>, Liu Ying <victor.liu@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Adrien Grassein <adrien.grassein@...il.com>, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@...asonboard.com>, Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>, Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Anitha Chrisanthus <anitha.chrisanthus@...el.com>,
Edmund Dea <edmund.j.dea@...el.com>, Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>, Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Hui Pu <Hui.Pu@...ealthcare.com>, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/26] drm/bridge: add drm_of_find_bridge()
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 02:05:32PM +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +/**
> + * drm_of_find_bridge - find the bridge corresponding to the device node in
> + * the global bridge list
> + * @np: device node
> + *
> + * The refcount of the returned bridge is incremented. Use drm_bridge_put()
> + * when done with it.
> + *
> + * RETURNS:
> + * drm_bridge control struct on success, NULL on failure
> + */
> +struct drm_bridge *drm_of_find_bridge(struct device_node *np)
So the convention we've mostly had was that the first argument would
define the prefix, ie. if we pass a drm_* pointer, the prefix is drm, if
we pass a device_node pointer, then the prefix is of.
Considering that convention, of_drm_find_bridge would be the ideal
candidate, but we can't use that obviously. What about
of_drm_find_and_get_bridge, or of_drm_get_bridge?
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (274 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists