[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df92a886-069a-450d-a551-dbfc3f629ead@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 11:41:50 +0100
From: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@...nel.org>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, Naoya Horiguchi
<nao.horiguchi@...il.com>, Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbirs@...dia.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mm/huge_memory: replace can_split_folio() with
direct refcount calculation
On 11/22/25 03:55, Zi Yan wrote:
> can_split_folio() is just a refcount comparison, making sure only the
> split caller holds an extra pin. Open code it with
> folio_expected_ref_count() != folio_ref_count() - 1. For the extra_pins
> used by folio_ref_freeze(), add folio_cache_references() to calculate it.
>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
> ---
> include/linux/huge_mm.h | 1 -
> mm/huge_memory.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> mm/vmscan.c | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> index 97686fb46e30..1ecaeccf39c9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> @@ -369,7 +369,6 @@ enum split_type {
> SPLIT_TYPE_NON_UNIFORM,
> };
>
> -bool can_split_folio(struct folio *folio, int caller_pins, int *pextra_pins);
> int __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
> unsigned int new_order);
> int folio_split_unmapped(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order);
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index c1f1055165dd..6c821c1c0ac3 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -3455,23 +3455,6 @@ static void lru_add_split_folio(struct folio *folio, struct folio *new_folio,
> }
> }
>
> -/* Racy check whether the huge page can be split */
> -bool can_split_folio(struct folio *folio, int caller_pins, int *pextra_pins)
> -{
> - int extra_pins;
> -
> - /* Additional pins from page cache */
> - if (folio_test_anon(folio))
> - extra_pins = folio_test_swapcache(folio) ?
> - folio_nr_pages(folio) : 0;
> - else
> - extra_pins = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> - if (pextra_pins)
> - *pextra_pins = extra_pins;
> - return folio_mapcount(folio) == folio_ref_count(folio) - extra_pins -
> - caller_pins;
> -}
> -
> static bool page_range_has_hwpoisoned(struct page *page, long nr_pages)
> {
> for (; nr_pages; page++, nr_pages--)
> @@ -3776,17 +3759,26 @@ int folio_check_splittable(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/* Number of folio references from the pagecache or the swapcache. */
> +static unsigned int folio_cache_references(const struct folio *folio)
> +{
> + if (folio_test_anon(folio) && !folio_test_swapcache(folio))
> + return 0;
> + return folio_nr_pages(folio);
> +}
> +
> static int __folio_freeze_and_split_unmapped(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
> struct page *split_at, struct xa_state *xas,
> struct address_space *mapping, bool do_lru,
> struct list_head *list, enum split_type split_type,
> - pgoff_t end, int *nr_shmem_dropped, int extra_pins)
> + pgoff_t end, int *nr_shmem_dropped)
> {
> struct folio *end_folio = folio_next(folio);
> struct folio *new_folio, *next;
> int old_order = folio_order(folio);
> int ret = 0;
> struct deferred_split *ds_queue;
> + int extra_pins = folio_cache_references(folio);
Can we just inline the call do folio_cache_references() and get rid of extra_pins.
(which is a bad name either way)
if (folio_ref_freeze(folio, folio_cache_references(folio) + 1) {
BTW, now that we have this helper, I wonder if we should then also do for
clarification on the unfreeze path:
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 0acdc2f26ee0c..7cbcf61b7971d 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3824,8 +3824,7 @@ static int __folio_freeze_and_split_unmapped(struct folio *folio, unsigned int n
zone_device_private_split_cb(folio, new_folio);
- expected_refs = folio_expected_ref_count(new_folio) + 1;
- folio_ref_unfreeze(new_folio, expected_refs);
+ folio_ref_unfreeze(new_folio, folio_cache_references(new_folio) + 1);
if (do_lru)
lru_add_split_folio(folio, new_folio, lruvec, list);
@@ -3868,8 +3867,7 @@ static int __folio_freeze_and_split_unmapped(struct folio *folio, unsigned int n
* Otherwise, a parallel folio_try_get() can grab @folio
* and its caller can see stale page cache entries.
*/
- expected_refs = folio_expected_ref_count(folio) + 1;
- folio_ref_unfreeze(folio, expected_refs);
+ folio_ref_unfreeze(folio, folio_cache_references(folio) + 1);
if (do_lru)
unlock_page_lruvec(lruvec);
--
Cheers
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists