[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lhuy0nvlios.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 13:27:15 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, LKML
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Michael Jeanson
<mjeanson@...icios.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, "Paul E.
McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, "Gautham R. Shenoy"
<gautham.shenoy@....com>, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>, Yury Norov
<yury.norov@...il.com>, Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V3 20/20] sched/mmcid: Switch over to the new mechanism
* Mark Brown:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 02:09:32PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Now that all pieces are in place, change the implementations of
>> sched_mm_cid_fork() and sched_mm_cid_exit() to adhere to the new strict
>> ownership scheme and switch context_switch() over to use the new
>> mm_cid_schedin() functionality.
>>
>> The common case is that there is no mode change required, which makes
>> fork() and exit() just update the user count and the constraints.
>
> I'm seeing boot failures on x86 qemu in -next which bisect to this
> patch. The boot gets to userspace but then grinds to a halt:
>
> https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/2118455#L542
>
> which isn't terribly informative unfortunately. I don't have any x86
> hardware, and nothing else seems affected.
I believe that's already discussed here:
<https://lore.kernel.org/873466jekm.ffs@tglx/>
Thanks,
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists