[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <414bc2c721bfc60b8b8a1b7d069ff0fc9b3e5283.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 16:48:11 +0100
From: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, Maarten Lankhorst
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Sam
Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, dakr@...hat.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, Helge Deller
<deller@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/13] PCI: Add devres helpers for iomap table
[resulting in backtraces on HPPA]
On Sun, 2025-11-23 at 08:42 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 01:50:15PM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > The pcim_iomap_devres.table administrated by pcim_iomap_table() has its
> > entries set and unset at several places throughout devres.c using manual
> > iterations which are effectively code duplications.
> >
> > Add pcim_add_mapping_to_legacy_table() and
> > pcim_remove_mapping_from_legacy_table() helper functions and use them where
> > possible.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240605081605.18769-4-pstanner@redhat.com
> > Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com>
> > [bhelgaas: s/short bar/int bar/ for consistency]
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/devres.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/devres.c b/drivers/pci/devres.c
> > index f13edd4a3873..845d6fab0ce7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/devres.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/devres.c
> > @@ -297,6 +297,52 @@ void __iomem * const *pcim_iomap_table(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcim_iomap_table);
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Fill the legacy mapping-table, so that drivers using the old API can
> > + * still get a BAR's mapping address through pcim_iomap_table().
> > + */
> > +static int pcim_add_mapping_to_legacy_table(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > + void __iomem *mapping, int bar)
> > +{
> > + void __iomem **legacy_iomap_table;
> > +
> > + if (bar >= PCI_STD_NUM_BARS)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + legacy_iomap_table = (void __iomem **)pcim_iomap_table(pdev);
> > + if (!legacy_iomap_table)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + /* The legacy mechanism doesn't allow for duplicate mappings. */
> > + WARN_ON(legacy_iomap_table[bar]);
> > +
>
> Ever since this patch has been applied, I see this warning on all hppa
> (parisc) systems.
>
> [ 0.978177] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at drivers/pci/devres.c:473 pcim_add_mapping_to_legacy_table.part.0+0x54/0x80
> [ 0.978850] Modules linked in:
> [ 0.979277] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.18.0-rc6-64bit+ #1 NONE
> [ 0.979519] Hardware name: 9000/785/C3700
> [ 0.979715]
> [ 0.979768] YZrvWESTHLNXBCVMcbcbcbcbOGFRQPDI
> [ 0.979886] PSW: 00001000000001000000000000001111 Not tainted
> [ 0.980006] r00-03 000000000804000f 00000000414e10a0 0000000040acb300 00000000434b1440
> [ 0.980167] r04-07 00000000414a78a0 0000000000029000 0000000000000000 0000000043522000
> [ 0.980314] r08-11 0000000000000000 0000000000000008 0000000000000000 00000000434b0de8
> [ 0.980461] r12-15 00000000434b11b0 000000004156a8a0 0000000043c655a0 0000000000000000
> [ 0.980608] r16-19 000000004016e080 000000004019e7d8 0000000000000030 0000000043549780
> [ 0.981106] r20-23 0000000020000000 0000000000000000 000000000800000e 0000000000000000
> [ 0.981317] r24-27 0000000000000000 000000000800000f 0000000043522260 00000000414a78a0
> [ 0.981480] r28-31 00000000436af480 00000000434b1680 00000000434b14d0 0000000000027000
> [ 0.981641] sr00-03 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> [ 0.981805] sr04-07 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> [ 0.981972]
> [ 0.982024] IASQ: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 IAOQ: 0000000040acb31c 0000000040acb320
> [ 0.982185] IIR: 03ffe01f ISR: 0000000000000000 IOR: 00000000436af410
> [ 0.982322] CPU: 0 CR30: 0000000043549780 CR31: 0000000000000000
> [ 0.982458] ORIG_R28: 00000000434b16b0
> [ 0.982548] IAOQ[0]: pcim_add_mapping_to_legacy_table.part.0+0x54/0x80
> [ 0.982733] IAOQ[1]: pcim_add_mapping_to_legacy_table.part.0+0x58/0x80
> [ 0.982871] RP(r2): pcim_add_mapping_to_legacy_table.part.0+0x38/0x80
> [ 0.983100] Backtrace:
> [ 0.983439] [<0000000040acba1c>] pcim_iomap+0xc4/0x170
> [ 0.983577] [<0000000040ba3e4c>] serial8250_pci_setup_port+0x8c/0x168
> [ 0.983725] [<0000000040ba7588>] setup_port+0x38/0x50
> [ 0.983837] [<0000000040ba7d94>] pci_hp_diva_setup+0x8c/0xd8
> [ 0.983957] [<0000000040baa47c>] pciserial_init_ports+0x2c4/0x358
> [ 0.984088] [<0000000040baa8bc>] pciserial_init_one+0x31c/0x330
> [ 0.984214] [<0000000040abfab4>] pci_device_probe+0x194/0x270
>
> Looking into serial8250_pci_setup_port():
>
> if (pci_resource_flags(dev, bar) & IORESOURCE_MEM) {
> if (!pcim_iomap(dev, bar, 0) && !pcim_iomap_table(dev))
> return -ENOMEM;
Strange. From the code I see here the WARN_ON in
pcim_add_mapping_to_legacy_table() should not fire. I suspect that it's
actually triggered somewhere else.
>
> This suggests that the failure is expected. I can see that pcim_iomap_table()
> is deprecated, and that one is supposed to use pcim_iomap() instead. However,
> pcim_iomap() _is_ alrady used, and I don't see a function which lets the
> caller replicate what is done above (attach multiple serial ports to the
> same PCI bar).
Is serial8250_pci_setup_port() invoked in a loop somewhere? Where does
the "attach multiple" happen?
>
> How would you suggest to fix the problem ?
I suggest you try to remove the `&& pcim_iomap_table(dev)` from above
to see if that's really the cause. pcim_iomap() already creates the
table, and if it succeeds the table has been created with absolute
certainty. The entries will also be present. So the table-check is
surplus.
Report back please if that helps, I'd want to understand what's
happening here.
Regards
P.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists