[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACePvbVNV_JRRY8p=dXj8YntR-0nRq3dbrBPz1G2bEmGH0jxpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 22:14:40 +0400
From: Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pratmal@...gle.com, sweettea@...gle.com, gthelen@...gle.com,
weixugc@...gle.com, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: ghost swapfile support for zswap
Hi Johannes,
On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 5:52 AM Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Nacked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
>
> I take that the only relevant part is you are zswap maintainer and I
> am the swap maintainer. Fine. I got the message. I will leave the
> zswap alone. I will find other ways to address the memory base swap
> tiers in swap.tiers.
I am sorry that I have said that. Let me take back what I said above.
I was upset when I considered you and others blocking the more optimal
solution and in favor of the less optimal solution. That is my short
temper, as usual.
Now I can see that you might not see one as more optimal than the
other as convincing as I do, or I haven't done a good job explaining
it.
Let me offer my sincere apology. I will reply to the technical aspect
of the question in other email.
Chris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists