[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<176411042002.938389.8098195696684849372.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 22:40:20 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
Cc: andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, jiang.biao@...ux.dev, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: call bpf_get_numa_node_id() in
trigger_count()
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2025 09:42:42 +0800 you wrote:
> The bench test "trig-kernel-count" can be used as a baseline comparison
> for fentry and other benchmarks, and the calling to bpf_get_numa_node_id()
> should be considered as composition of the baseline. So, let's call it in
> trigger_count(). Meanwhile, rename trigger_count() to
> trigger_kernel_count() to make it easier understand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@...natelecom.cn>
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: call bpf_get_numa_node_id() in trigger_count()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f2cb0660ac99
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists