[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aSUtL9qxYa6/GCfP@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 20:14:39 -0800
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
CC: <jean-philippe@...aro.org>, <robin.murphy@....com>, <joro@...tes.org>,
<jgg@...dia.com>, <balbirs@...dia.com>, <miko.lenczewski@....com>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <kevin.tian@...el.com>, <praan@...gle.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce a per-domain
arm_smmu_invs array
On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 09:42:31PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 08, 2025 at 12:08:04AM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > +VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT
> > +struct arm_smmu_invs *arm_smmu_invs_merge(struct arm_smmu_invs *invs,
> > + struct arm_smmu_invs *to_merge)
> > +{
> > + struct arm_smmu_invs *new_invs;
> > + struct arm_smmu_inv *new;
> > + size_t num_trashes = 0;
> > + size_t num_adds = 0;
> > + size_t i, j;
> > +
> > + for (i = j = 0; i < invs->num_invs || j < to_merge->num_invs;) {
>
> Maybe worth having a simple iterator macro for this?
I added two macros:
+#define arm_smmu_invs_for_each_inv(invs, idx, inv) \
+ for (idx = 0, inv = &invs->inv[0]; idx < invs->num_invs; \
+ inv = &invs->inv[++idx])
+#define arm_smmu_invs_for_each_idx_dual(invs1, idx1, invs2, idx2) \
+ for (idx1 = idx2 = 0; idx1 < invs1->num_invs || idx2 < invs2->num_invs;)
Thanks
Nicolin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists