linux-kernel - Re: [tip:core/rseq 25/39] include/linux/rseq_entry.h:132:3: error: invalid operand for instruction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <897c6ba7-e27d-4170-be56-4d0f544bfa42@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 08:38:40 +0100
From: "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, Ingo Molnar
 <mingo@...nel.org>, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
 linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:core/rseq 25/39] include/linux/rseq_entry.h:132:3: error:
 invalid operand for instruction



Le 24/11/2025 à 20:15, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 25 2025 at 01:37, kernel test robot wrote:
>> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git core/rseq
>> head:   21782b3a5cd40892cb2995aa1ec3e74dd1112f1d
>> commit: abc850e7616c91ebaa3f5ba3617ab0a104d45039 [25/39] rseq: Provide and use rseq_update_user_cs()
>> config: powerpc-randconfig-002-20251124 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251125/202511250134.i0Jm8d7I-lkp@intel.com/config)
>> compiler: clang version 16.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 7cbf1a2591520c2491aa35339f227775f4d3adf6)
>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251125/202511250134.i0Jm8d7I-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>>
>> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
>> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511250134.i0Jm8d7I-lkp@intel.com/
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>     In file included from kernel/rseq.c:75:
>>>> include/linux/rseq_entry.h:132:3: error: invalid operand for instruction
>>                     unsafe_get_user(start_ip, &ucs->start_ip, efault);
>>                     ^
>>     include/linux/uaccess.h:606:2: note: expanded from macro 'unsafe_get_user'
>>             arch_unsafe_get_user(x, ptr, local_label);      \
>>             ^
>>     arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:458:2: note: expanded from macro 'arch_unsafe_get_user'
>>             __get_user_size_goto(__gu_val, __gu_addr, sizeof(*(p)), e); \
>>             ^
>>     arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:282:2: note: expanded from macro '__get_user_size_goto'
>>             __get_user_size_allowed(x, ptr, size, __gus_retval);    \
>>             ^
>>     arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:273:10: note: expanded from macro '__get_user_size_allowed'
>>             case 8: __get_user_asm2(x, (u64 __user *)ptr, retval);  break;  \
>>                     ^
>>     arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:256:4: note: expanded from macro '__get_user_asm2'
>>                     "       li %1+1,0\n"                    \
>>                      ^
>>     <inline asm>:7:5: note: instantiated into assembly here
>>             li 31+1,0
> 
> Definitely not a problem of tip core/rseq. It just ends up in
> __get_user_asm2() and then the compiler gets unhappy about the PowerPC
> inline assembly for whatever reason.

I see it is a CLANG build.

CLANG might be less flexible, can you test with following change ?

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h 
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 4f5a46a77fa2..33d5f7ade254 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ __gus_failed:								\
  		".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"		\
  		"4:	li %0,%3\n"			\
  		"	li %1,0\n"			\
-		"	li %1+1,0\n"			\
+		"	li %L1,0\n"			\
  		"	b 3b\n"				\
  		".previous\n"				\
  		EX_TABLE(1b, 4b)			\


Thanks
Christophe