[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251125083649.1814558-1-chenjinghuang2@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 08:36:49 +0000
From: Chen Jinghuang <chenjinghuang2@...wei.com>
To: <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: <bsegall@...gle.com>, <chenjinghuang2@...wei.com>,
<dietmar.eggemann@....com>, <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <mgorman@...e.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, <vschneid@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] sched/rt: Skip currently executing CPU in rto_next_cpu()
CPU0 becomes overloaded when hosting a CPU-bound RT task, a non-CPU-bound
RT task, and a CFS task stuck in kernel space. When other CPUs switch from
RT to non-RT tasks, RT load balancing (LB) is triggered; with
HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI enabled, they send IPIs to CPU0 to drive the execution
of rto_push_irq_work_func. During push_rt_task on CPU0,
if next_task->prio < rq->donor->prio, resched_curr() sets NEED_RESCHED
and after the push operation completes, CPU0 calls rto_next_cpu().
Since only CPU0 is overloaded in this scenario, rto_next_cpu() should
ideally return -1 (no further IPI needed).
However, multiple CPUs invoking tell_cpu_to_push() during LB increments
rd->rto_loop_next. Even when rd->rto_cpu is set to -1, the mismatch between
rd->rto_loop and rd->rto_loop_next forces rto_next_cpu() to restart its
search from -1. With CPU0 remaining overloaded (satisfying rt_nr_migratory
&& rt_nr_total > 1), it gets reselected, causing CPU0 to queue irq_work to
itself and send self-IPIs repeatedly. As long as CPU0 stays overloaded and
other CPUs run pull_rt_tasks(), it falls into an infinite self-IPI loop,
wasting CPU cycles on unnecessary interrupt handling.
The triggering scenario is as follows:
cpu0 cpu1 cpu2
pull_rt_task
tell_cpu_to_push
<------------irq_work_queue_on
rto_push_irq_work_func
push_rt_task
resched_curr(rq) pull_rt_task
rto_next_cpu tell_cpu_to_push
<-------------------------- atomic_inc(rto_loop_next)
rd->rto_loop != next
rto_next_cpu
irq_work_queue_on
rto_push_irq_work_func
Fix redundant self-IPI by filtering the initiating CPU in rto_next_cpu().
Fixes: 4bdced5c9a292 ("sched/rt: Simplify the IPI based RT balancing logic")
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Chen Jinghuang <chenjinghuang2@...wei.com>
---
v1-->v2:
- Replace the original "check NEED_RESCHED on target CPU"
logic with "skip the currently executing CPU"
- This modification eliminates self-IPIS
---
---
kernel/sched/rt.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 7936d4333731..dc0d583aa59a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -2100,6 +2100,7 @@ static void push_rt_tasks(struct rq *rq)
*/
static int rto_next_cpu(struct root_domain *rd)
{
+ int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
int next;
int cpu;
@@ -2118,14 +2119,17 @@ static int rto_next_cpu(struct root_domain *rd)
*/
for (;;) {
- /* When rto_cpu is -1 this acts like cpumask_first() */
- cpu = cpumask_next(rd->rto_cpu, rd->rto_mask);
-
- rd->rto_cpu = cpu;
+ do {
+ /* When rto_cpu is -1 this acts like cpumask_first() */
+ cpu = cpumask_next(rd->rto_cpu, rd->rto_mask);
+ rd->rto_cpu = cpu;
+ /* Do not send IPI to self */
+ } while (cpu == this_cpu);
if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
return cpu;
+
rd->rto_cpu = -1;
/*
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists