[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251125-punkten-jegliche-5aee8187381d@brauner>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 10:05:50 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: mark lookup_slow() as noinline
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 03:49:30PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> Otherwise it gets inlined notably in walk_component(), which convinces
> the compiler to push/pop additional registers in the fast path to
> accomodate existence of the inlined version.
>
> Shortens the fast path of that routine from 87 to 71 bytes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
> ---
Fwiw, the biggest problem is that we need to end up with something
obvious so that we don't accidently destroy any potential performance
gain in say 2 years because everyone forgot why we did things this way.
>
> The intent is to get to a point where I can inline walk_component and
> step_into. This is probably the last patch of the sort before I write a
> patchset + provide bench results.
>
> fs/namei.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> index 11295fcf877c..667360deef48 100644
> --- a/fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/namei.c
> @@ -1863,7 +1863,7 @@ static struct dentry *__lookup_slow(const struct qstr *name,
> return dentry;
> }
>
> -static struct dentry *lookup_slow(const struct qstr *name,
> +static noinline struct dentry *lookup_slow(const struct qstr *name,
> struct dentry *dir,
> unsigned int flags)
> {
> --
> 2.48.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists