[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251125-aromatic-savvy-eagle-b81696@kuoka>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 10:46:43 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Valentina Fernandez <valentina.fernandezalanis@...rochip.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Microchip IPC
remoteproc
On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 02:21:56PM +0000, Valentina Fernandez wrote:
> Microchip family of RISC-V SoCs typically have one or more application
> clusters. These clusters can be configured to run in an Asymmetric
> Multi Processing (AMP) mode.
>
> Add a dt-binding for these application clusters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentina Fernandez <valentina.fernandezalanis@...rochip.com>
> ---
> .../microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc.yaml | 95 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..348902f9a202
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Microchip IPC Remote Processor
> +
> +description:
> + Microchip family of RISC-V SoCs typically have one or more
> + clusters. These clusters can be configured to run in an Asymmetric
> + Multi Processing (AMP) mode where clusters are split in independent
> + software contexts.
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Valentina Fernandez <valentina.fernandezalanis@...rochip.com>
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc
This should be SoC specific compatible.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists