[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aSWKLefd_mhycGDv@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 10:51:25 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: longli@...ux.microsoft.com
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Shradha Gupta <shradhagupta@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Konstantin Taranov <kotaranov@...rosoft.com>,
Souradeep Chakrabarti <schakrabarti@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Erick Archer <erick.archer@...look.com>,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v3] net: mana: Handle hardware recovery events
when probing the device
On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 03:07:13PM -0800, longli@...ux.microsoft.com wrote:
> From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
>
> When MANA is being probed, it's possible that hardware is in recovery
> mode and the device may get GDMA_EQE_HWC_RESET_REQUEST over HWC in the
> middle of the probe. Detect such condition and go through the recovery
> service procedure.
>
> Fixes: fbe346ce9d62 ("net: mana: Handle Reset Request from MANA NIC")
If this is a fix, should it be targeted at net rather than net-next?
Alternatively, if it is not a fix for net, then I suggest dropping
the Fixes tag and adding something about commit fbe346ce9d62 ("net: mana:
Handle Reset Request from MANA NIC") to the patch description, above the
tags (with a blank line in between).
> Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
> ---
> Changes
> v2: Use a list for handling multiple devices.
> Use disable_delayed_work_sync() on driver exit.
> Replace atomic_t with flags to detect if interrupt happens before probe finishes
>
> v3: Rebase to latest net-next. Change list_for_each_entry_safe() to while(!list_empty()).
Code changes look good to me.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists