[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aSWPnRBRdPS8vnir@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 13:14:37 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: guptarud@...il.com, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] iio: accel: Prevent NULL pointer dereference in
interrupt setup
On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 11:45:22AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 11/25/25 12:35 AM, Rudraksha Gupta via B4 Relay wrote:
> >
> > The bmc150_accel_set_interrupt() function assumes that the interrupt
> > info is provided. However, when no IRQ is provided, the info pointer
> > remains NULL, leading to a kernel oops:
>
> Hm, are you sure your device really doesn't have a pin connected to
> the IC's interrupt line?
I don't know the actual case here, but in general such a design occurred
in real life. So, shouldn't be a surprise to see another polling only mode
connection like this.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists