[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c7032b82-12b3-4334-b568-86cf620c2ee7@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 14:06:40 +0100
From: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
luto@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org, kees@...nel.org, wad@...omium.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ldv@...ace.io, macro@...am.me.uk, deller@....de,
mark.rutland@....com, song@...nel.org, mbenes@...e.cz, ryan.roberts@....com,
ada.coupriediaz@....com, anshuman.khandual@....com, broonie@...nel.org,
pengcan@...inos.cn, dvyukov@...gle.com, kmal@...k.li, lihongbo22@...wei.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/11] arm64/ptrace: Split report_syscall()
On 19/11/2025 10:49, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>
> On 2025/11/19 1:09, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
>> On 17/11/2025 14:30, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>>> The generic syscall entry code has the form:
>>>
>>> | syscall_trace_enter()
>>> | {
>>> | ptrace_report_syscall_entry()
>>> | }
>>> |
>>> | syscall_exit_work()
>>> | {
>>> | ptrace_report_syscall_exit()
>>> | }
>>>
>>> In preparation for moving arm64 over to the generic entry code, split
>>> report_syscall() to two separate enter and exit functions to align
>>> the structure of the arm64 code with syscall_trace_enter() and
>>> syscall_exit_work() from the generic entry code.
>>>
>>> No functional changes.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
>>> index 4b001121c72d..5534c175ceb7 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
>>> @@ -2317,7 +2317,7 @@ enum ptrace_syscall_dir {
>>> PTRACE_SYSCALL_EXIT,
>>> };
>> This is now unused so it should be removed.
> Sure.
In fact it is not unused, not sure how I missed that... r12/x7 is set to
one of those values during ptrace_syscall_entry().
It would be a good idea to add a comment saying those values are part of
the ABI and must not be changed.
- Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists