[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4cb88319-6514-4145-8309-01051547b851@google.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 16:02:50 -0800
From: Amit Sunil Dhamne <amitsd@...gle.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Sebastian Reichel
<sre@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, André Draszik
<andre.draszik@...aro.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
RD Babiera <rdbabiera@...gle.com>, Kyle Tso <kyletso@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: mfd: maxim,max77759: add charger child
node
On 11/23/25 1:30 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/11/2025 09:35, Amit Sunil Dhamne via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Amit Sunil Dhamne <amitsd@...gle.com>
>>
>> The Maxim MAX77759 MFD includes a charger function, hence add its
>> binding as a property. Also, update the example to include charger.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Sunil Dhamne <amitsd@...gle.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max77759.yaml | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max77759.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max77759.yaml
>> index 525de9ab3c2b..29132f73f2c8 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max77759.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max77759.yaml
>> @@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ properties:
>> nvmem-0:
>> $ref: /schemas/nvmem/maxim,max77759-nvmem.yaml
>>
>> + charger:
>> + $ref: /schemas/power/supply/maxim,max77759-charger.yaml
> You need to explain dependencies/merging in the cover letter. This patch
> now cannot be merged alone through MFD.
>
> Or just decouple the dependency and list here only compatible, assuming
> this child node even stays.
Would it be okay if I drop this patch from this series and re-send it
while mentioning the dependency?
>> +
>> required:
>> - compatible
>> - interrupts
>> @@ -95,5 +98,14 @@ examples:
>> };
>> };
>> };
>> +
>> + charger {
>> + compatible = "maxim,max77759-charger";
>> + power-supplies = <&maxtcpc>;
> Feels like you miss here battery.
I have added the example in [1]. We can discuss there in case there are
further concerns.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/7ad91325-e881-461d-b39e-6ff15d98b3c5@google.com/T/#u
BR,
Amit
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists