linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: fix watermark truncation caused by type cast

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <VI2PR04MB111477CFB4C4253842C234FF9E8DEA@VI2PR04MB11147.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 02:10:25 +0000
From: Carlos Song <carlos.song@....com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>, david laight
	<david.laight@...box.com>, Frank Li <frank.li@....com>
CC: "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>, "rongqianfeng@...o.com"
	<rongqianfeng@...o.com>, "linux-spi@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: fix watermark truncation caused by
 type cast



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2025 11:11 PM
> To: david laight <david.laight@...box.com>
> Cc: Frank Li <frank.li@....com>; Carlos Song <carlos.song@....com>;
> broonie@...nel.org; rongqianfeng@...o.com; linux-spi@...r.kernel.org;
> imx@...ts.linux.dev; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: fix watermark truncation caused by
> type cast
> 
> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
> opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report this
> email' button
> 
> 
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 10:57:16AM +0000, david laight wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Nov 2025 11:19:34 -0500
> > Frank Li <Frank.li@....com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 11:03:55AM +0800, carlos.song@....com wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > + /*
> > > > +  * t->len is 'unsigned' and txfifosize and watermrk is 'u8',
> > > > + force
> > > > +  * type cast is inevitable. When len > 255, len will be
> > > > + truncated in min_t(),
> > > > +  * it caused wrong watermark set. 'unsigned int' is as the
> > > > + designated type
> > > > +  * for min_t() to avoid truncation.
> > > > +  */
> > > > + fsl_lpspi->watermark = min_t(unsigned int,
> > > >                                fsl_lpspi->txfifosize,
> > > >                                t->len);
> > >
> > > There are thread discussion about min() and min_t()
> > >
> > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flo
> > > re.kernel.org%2Fall%2F20251119224140.8616-1-david.laight.linux%40gma
> > >
> il.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Ccarlos.song%40nxp.com%7C24c955c5ab414a26
> 730
> > >
> a08de2c34dda3%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C6389
> 96802
> > >
> 735067934%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiO
> iIwLj
> > >
> AuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%
> 7C
> > > %7C&sdata=NEBirtRBR5RXz9cUXuqWVtHT6b3memVhsRe5mA7AIAQ%3D&
> reserved=0
> >
> > The big comment even carefully explains that the two types are unsigned
> ones.
> > So a simple min() is absolutely fine (and the comment can go away).
> >
> > The old typecheck in min was just so stupid.
> > In this case the 'u8' variable is promoted to 'int' (they always are)
> > and then converted to 'unsigned int' to match the other type.
> > Even though there is an implicit 'int' => 'unsigned int' cast it is
> > impossible for a negative value to become a large positive on (which
> > is the only justification for the type check).
> >
> > I'd check the file for other uses on min_t() as well.
> 
> Just came to this thread to echoing what David said. +1 to the above, please
> convert to simple min(). The use cases for min_t() and max_t() should be rare
> really.
> 

Hi,

Thank you for all ack about this patch.
>From my points, min() ot min_t(unsigned, x, x) both are ok.
This patch has been picked, do I need to do a new patch to use min() instead this patch?

Carlos
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>