[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe36de30-9449-4d03-bb19-122604105bb5@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 12:58:19 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: sparkhuang <huangshaobo3@...omi.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, weipengliang@...omi.com,
wengjinfei@...omi.com, caodan1@...omi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Protect regulator_supply_alias_list
with regulator_list_mutex
On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 02:15:42PM +0800, sparkhuang wrote:
> - map->alias_supply = alias_id;
> + mutex_lock(®ulator_list_mutex);
> + map = regulator_find_supply_alias(dev, id);
> + if (map) {
> + mutex_unlock(®ulator_list_mutex);
> + kfree(new_map);
> + return -EEXIST;
> + }
>
> + new_map->src_dev = dev;
> + new_map->src_supply = id;
> + new_map->alias_dev = alias_dev;
> + new_map->alias_supply = alias_id;
> list_add(&map->list, ®ulator_supply_alias_list);
> -
> + mutex_lock(®ulator_list_mutex);
This is locking regulator_list_mutex which is already locked, I think
you meant mutex_unlock().
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists