[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251126144650.2799567-1-jackzxcui1989@163.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 22:46:50 +0800
From: Xin Zhao <jackzxcui1989@....com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: hch@...radead.org,
jackzxcui1989@....com,
jirislaby@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tty: tty_port: add workqueue to flip tty buffer
On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 13:10:49 +0100 Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I don't know, what have you found in your testing? Will multiple
> workqueues cause too much overhead for large multi-port systems (i.e.
> modem banks?)
>
> Perhaps start with just a single workqueue and then increase it if there
> is contention later if people notice?
OK. I will allocate single workqueue of one tty_driver in v4, simplifying
the logic for creating and releasing the workqueue.
--
Xin Zhao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists