lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251126163600.583036-3-stefanha@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 11:35:58 -0500
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
To: linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	Mike Christie <michael.christie@...cle.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] nvme: reject invalid pr_read_keys() num_keys values

The pr_read_keys() interface has a u32 num_keys parameter. The NVMe
Reservation Report command has a u32 maximum length. Reject num_keys
values that are too large to fit.

This will become important when pr_read_keys() is exposed to untrusted
userspace via an <linux/pr.h> ioctl.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/pr.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pr.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pr.c
index ca6a74607b139..476a0518a11ca 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/pr.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pr.c
@@ -233,6 +233,11 @@ static int nvme_pr_read_keys(struct block_device *bdev,
 	int ret, i;
 	bool eds;
 
+	/* Check that keys fit into u32 rse_len */
+	if (num_keys > -(u32)offsetof(typeof(*rse), regctl_eds) /
+	               sizeof(rse->regctl_eds[0]))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	/*
 	 * Assume we are using 128-bit host IDs and allocate a buffer large
 	 * enough to get enough keys to fill the return keys buffer.
-- 
2.52.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ