lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251126165532.160730-1-trannamatk@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 23:55:32 +0700
From: Nam Tran <trannamatk@...il.com>
To: krzk+dt@...nel.org
Cc: lee@...nel.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	pavel@...nel.org,
	rdunlap@...radead.org,
	christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr,
	robh@...nel.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org,
	corbet@....net,
	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 1/3] dt-bindings: leds: add TI/National Semiconductor LP5812 LED Driver

On Mon, 24 Nov 2025, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

>>> +examples:
>>> +  - |
>>> +    #include <dt-bindings/leds/common.h>
>>> +
>>> +    i2c {
>>> +        #address-cells = <1>;
>>> +        #size-cells = <0>;
>>> +
>>> +        led-controller@1b {
>>> +            #address-cells = <1>;
>>> +            #size-cells = <0>;
>>> +            compatible = "ti,lp5812";
>>> +            reg = <0x1b>;
>>> +            ti,scan-mode = "tcm:4:0:1:2:3";
>>> +            vcc-supply = <&vdd_3v3_reg>;
>>> +
>>> +            led@0 {
>>> +                reg = <0x0>;
>>> +                label = "LED0";
>>> +                led-max-microamp = <25500>;
>>> +            };
>>> +
>>> +            led@1 {
>>> +                reg = <0x1>;
>>> +                label = "LED1";
>> 
>> Completely useless label... You require labels, so people need to write
>> something but since they do not know what to write they call LED 1 a
>> LED1. This is just not helping.
>> 
>> Use color and function properties. Same everywhere else.
>>
>
>And now I went to older versions and I see they were correct - you had
>color! You replace correct code with wrong one and drop review. This
>patchset is not really improving.
>
>BTW, You actually received review also at v6, so this was reviewed 3 or
>more times. Way too many times.

Thanks for your feedback.
To address your concerns, I plan to roll back to v17, which was reviewed
and approved by Rob.

The only intentional addition in v17 compared to v14, which you previously
reviewed, is the ti,scan-mode property to configure the LP5812 scan mode.
No other aspects of the binding are modified.

I hope this resolves the issues and keeps the binding stable.

Thanks again for your guidance.

Best regards,
Nam Tran

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ