linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] soc: qcom: llcc: Fix usecase id macro alignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <xswvpxmqii2cvus2rgjenynt374hgt7qmcibq5a4wv3emudi5b@kjceg2b6dltn>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 11:17:38 -0600
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: Pankaj Patil <pankaj.patil@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, 
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, 
	Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] soc: qcom: llcc: Fix usecase id macro alignment

On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 05:08:35PM +0530, Pankaj Patil wrote:
> On 11/26/2025 2:29 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 02:46:23PM +0530, Pankaj Patil wrote:
> >> Aligned macro values for usecase id along the column length
> >> -#define LLCC_CAMOFE	 71
> >> -#define LLCC_CAMRTIP	 72
> >> -#define LLCC_CAMSRTIP	 73
> >> -#define LLCC_CAMRTRF	 74
> >> -#define LLCC_CAMSRTRF	 75
> >> -#define LLCC_VIDEO_APV	 83
> >> -#define LLCC_COMPUTE1	 87
> >> -#define LLCC_CPUSS_OPP	 88
> >> -#define LLCC_CPUSSMPAM	 89
> >> -#define LLCC_CAM_IPE_STROV	 92
> >> -#define LLCC_CAM_OFE_STROV	 93
> >> -#define LLCC_CPUSS_HEU	 94
> >> -#define LLCC_MDM_PNG_FIXED	 100
> >> +#define LLCC_CPUSS         1
> >> +#define LLCC_VIDSC0        2
> >> +#define LLCC_VIDSC1        3
> >> +#define LLCC_ROTATOR       4
> >> +#define LLCC_VOICE         5
> > This does not look right - you still have here spaces, so nothing fixed.
> >
> > I don't think this change is useful. You replaced one poor alignment
> > into another poor alignment, so IMO better not to touch this at all.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> >
> Sure, Will drop this patch in next revision
> 

No need to send a new version unless you get any additional feedback on
the two useful patches.

Regards,
Bjorn