[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <078310e7-b385-4694-bae8-5f53ff11091b@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 10:15:47 -0800
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org" <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"dakr@...nel.org" <dakr@...nel.org>, "airlied@...il.com"
<airlied@...il.com>, Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
"ojeda@...nel.org" <ojeda@...nel.org>,
"alex.gaynor@...il.com" <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
"boqun.feng@...il.com" <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
"gary@...yguo.net" <gary@...yguo.net>,
"bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com" <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
"lossin@...nel.org" <lossin@...nel.org>,
"a.hindborg@...nel.org" <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
"aliceryhl@...gle.com" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
"tmgross@...ch.edu" <tmgross@...ch.edu>, "simona@...ll.ch"
<simona@...ll.ch>,
"maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com" <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
"mripard@...nel.org" <mripard@...nel.org>,
"tzimmermann@...e.de" <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Timur Tabi <ttabi@...dia.com>,
"joel@...lfernandes.org" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
"elle@...thered-steel.dev" <elle@...thered-steel.dev>,
"daniel.almeida@...labora.com" <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>, "phasta@...nel.org" <phasta@...nel.org>,
"nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Nouveau <nouveau-bounces@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] rust: helpers: Add list helpers for C linked list
operations
On 11/26/25 2:06 AM, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 2:39 AM John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yes. I am increasingly uneasy with the Rust for Linux approach, and
>> now the Nova approach, of adding in "things we might need".
>
> Excuse me, what "Rust for Linux approach"?
>
> No, we do not add dead code unless justified, just like everywhere
> else in the Linux kernel.
>
> Yes, there are a few exceptional cases, but it is just that, exceptional.
>
I stand corrected (and relieved)! :)
Thanks, Miguel.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists