[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aSdPYYqPD5V7Yeh6@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 19:05:05 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Xie Yuanbin <xieyuanbin1@...wei.com>, brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz,
will@...nel.org, nico@...xnic.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hch@....de, jack@...e.com, wozizhi@...weicloud.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
lilinjie8@...wei.com, liaohua4@...wei.com,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, pangliyuan1@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vfs: Fix might sleep in load_unaligned_zeropad()
with rcu read lock held
On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 06:48:20PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> It's been years since I looked at 32bit arm exception handling, so I'd need
> quite a bit of (re)RTF{S,M} before I'm comfortable with poking in
> arch/arm/mm/fault.c; better let ARM folks deal with that. But arch/* is
> where it should be dealt with; as for papering over that in fs/*:
Don't expect that to happen. I've not looked at it for over a decade,
I do very little 32-bit ARM stuff anymore. Others have modified the
fault handling, the VM has changed, I basically no longer have the
knowledge. Effectively, 32-bit ARM is unmaintained now, although it
still has many users.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists