[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251126031916.3641176-1-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 11:19:16 +0800
From: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>
To: <rafael@...nel.org>, <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
<zhanjie9@...ilicon.com>, <lihuisong@...wei.com>, <yubowen8@...wei.com>,
<zhangpengjie2@...wei.com>, <wangzhi12@...wei.com>,
<linhongye@...artners.com>, <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Return -EINVAL if no policy is boost supported
In cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(), if all the policies are boost
unsupported, policy_set_boost() will not be called and this function will
return 0. But it is better to return an error to indicate that the platform
doesn't support boost.
Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index e8d7544b77b8..2df714b24074 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2806,7 +2806,9 @@ static int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
unsigned long flags;
- int ret = 0;
+
+ /* Return -EINVAL if no policy is boost supported. */
+ int ret = -EINVAL;
/*
* Don't compare 'cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled' with 'state' here to
@@ -2824,14 +2826,12 @@ static int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
ret = policy_set_boost(policy, state);
if (ret)
- goto err_reset_state;
+ break;
}
cpus_read_unlock();
- return 0;
-
-err_reset_state:
- cpus_read_unlock();
+ if (!ret)
+ return 0;
write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = !state;
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists