[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DEI89VUEYXAJ.1IQQPC3QRLITP@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 10:16:30 +0900
From: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@...dia.com>
To: "Joel Fernandes" <joelagnelf@...dia.com>, "Alexandre Courbot"
<acourbot@...dia.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org" <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"dakr@...nel.org" <dakr@...nel.org>, "airlied@...il.com"
<airlied@...il.com>, "Alistair Popple" <apopple@...dia.com>,
"ojeda@...nel.org" <ojeda@...nel.org>, "alex.gaynor@...il.com"
<alex.gaynor@...il.com>, "boqun.feng@...il.com" <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
"gary@...yguo.net" <gary@...yguo.net>, "bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com"
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "lossin@...nel.org" <lossin@...nel.org>,
"a.hindborg@...nel.org" <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, "aliceryhl@...gle.com"
<aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "tmgross@...ch.edu" <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
"simona@...ll.ch" <simona@...ll.ch>, "maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com"
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, "mripard@...nel.org"
<mripard@...nel.org>, "tzimmermann@...e.de" <tzimmermann@...e.de>, "John
Hubbard" <jhubbard@...dia.com>, "Timur Tabi" <ttabi@...dia.com>,
"joel@...lfernandes.org" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
"elle@...thered-steel.dev" <elle@...thered-steel.dev>,
"daniel.almeida@...labora.com" <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>, "Andrea
Righi" <arighi@...dia.com>, "phasta@...nel.org" <phasta@...nel.org>,
"nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>, "Nouveau"
<nouveau-bounces@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] rust: helpers: Add list helpers for C linked
list operations
On Wed Nov 26, 2025 at 3:16 AM JST, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 25, 2025, at 9:52 AM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed Nov 12, 2025 at 2:13 AM JST, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>> Add Rust helper functions for common C linked list operations
>>> that are implemented as macros or inline functions and thus not
>>> directly accessible from Rust.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
>>> ---
>>> rust/helpers/helpers.c | 1 +
>>> rust/helpers/list.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 rust/helpers/list.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/rust/helpers/helpers.c b/rust/helpers/helpers.c
>>> index 79c72762ad9c..634fa2386bbb 100644
>>> --- a/rust/helpers/helpers.c
>>> +++ b/rust/helpers/helpers.c
>>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>>> #include "io.c"
>>> #include "jump_label.c"
>>> #include "kunit.c"
>>> +#include "list.c"
>>> #include "maple_tree.c"
>>> #include "mm.c"
>>> #include "mutex.c"
>>> diff --git a/rust/helpers/list.c b/rust/helpers/list.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..fea2a18621da
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/rust/helpers/list.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Helpers for C Circular doubly linked list implementation.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#include <linux/list.h>
>>> +
>>> +bool rust_helper_list_empty(const struct list_head *head)
>>> +{
>>> + return list_empty(head);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void rust_helper_list_del(struct list_head *entry)
>>> +{
>>> + list_del(entry);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void rust_helper_INIT_LIST_HEAD(struct list_head *list)
>>> +{
>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(list);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void rust_helper_list_add(struct list_head *new, struct list_head *head)
>>> +{
>>> + list_add(new, head);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void rust_helper_list_add_tail(struct list_head *new, struct list_head *head)
>>> +{
>>> + list_add_tail(new, head);
>>> +}
>>
>> Just noticed, but of these helpers only `INIT_LIST_HEAD` and
>> `list_add_tail` seem to be used (in doccomments).
>
> Correct, but it makes sense to add the most obvious/common ones (also to make it clear that using these are supported).
"It makes sense" is subjective, and in this case I am confident it is
not the right intuition to add dead code just for the sake of it.
Each of these helpers adds a potential breakage point from the C API
should the latter change, so we should only add them if they are indeed
necessary.
Actually, some of these helpers are not used when they could have been -
you have a `is_empty` method that rewrites the C function instead of
calling the helper. The only helpers that are unjustified as of now as
`list_add` and `list_del`, and these are easy to add when they become
necessary.
But this raises an interesting dilemma: these helpers cannot be inlined
and add the overhead of a function call. On the other hand, the
definition of `list_head` is so excessively simple that manipulating it
directly is virtually as intuitive as invoking the helper - and doesn't
bear the overhead. So should we double-down on these helpers, or just
drop them completely and re-implement the list functionality we need for
increased performance?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists