[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<VI2PR04MB1114788C5ADCB9D42399D12C1E8DEA@VI2PR04MB11147.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 08:34:18 +0000
From: Carlos Song <carlos.song@....com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
CC: "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>, Frank Li <frank.li@....com>,
"hawnguo@...nel.org" <hawnguo@...nel.org>, "s.hauer@...gutronix.de"
<s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>, "linux-spi@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 5/6] spi: imx: support dynamic burst length for
ECSPI DMA mode
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2025 4:20 PM
> To: Carlos Song <carlos.song@....com>
> Cc: broonie@...nel.org; Frank Li <frank.li@....com>; hawnguo@...nel.org;
> s.hauer@...gutronix.de; kernel@...gutronix.de; festevam@...il.com;
> linux-spi@...r.kernel.org; imx@...ts.linux.dev;
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 5/6] spi: imx: support dynamic burst length for ECSPI
> DMA mode
>
> On 25.11.2025 18:06:17, Carlos Song wrote:
> > +static int spi_imx_dma_transfer(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx,
> > + struct spi_transfer *transfer)
> > +{
> > + bool word_delay = transfer->word_delay.value != 0;
> > + int ret;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + ret = spi_imx_dma_data_prepare(spi_imx, transfer, word_delay);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + transfer->error |= SPI_TRANS_FAIL_NO_START;
> > + dev_err(spi_imx->dev, "DMA data prepare fail\n");
> > + goto fallback_pio;
> > + }
> > +
> > + spi_imx->rx_offset = 0;
> > +
> > + /* Each dma_package performs a separate DMA transfer once */
> > + for (i = 0; i < spi_imx->dma_package_num; i++) {
> > + ret = spi_imx_dma_map(spi_imx, &spi_imx->dma_data[i]);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + transfer->error |= SPI_TRANS_FAIL_NO_START;
>
> What about:
>
> if (i == 0)
> transfer->error |= SPI_TRANS_FAIL_NO_START;
>
> instead of removing the later?
for (i = 0; i < spi_imx->dma_package_num; i++) {
ret = spi_imx_dma_map(spi_imx, &spi_imx->dma_data[i]);
if (ret < 0) {
if (I == 0)
transfer->error |= SPI_TRANS_FAIL_NO_START;
dev_err(spi_imx->dev, "DMA map fail\n");
break;
}
...
- /* If no any dma package data is transferred, fallback to PIO mode transfer */
- if ((transfer->error & SPI_TRANS_FAIL_NO_START) && i != 0)
- transfer->error &= !SPI_TRANS_FAIL_NO_START;
return ret;
Just like this? I accept this. I can fix this in V2
> > + dev_err(spi_imx->dev, "DMA map fail\n");
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Update the CTRL register BL field */
> > + writel(spi_imx->dma_data[i].cmd_word, spi_imx->base +
> MX51_ECSPI_CTRL);
> > +
> > + ret = spi_imx_dma_package_transfer(spi_imx,
> &spi_imx->dma_data[i],
> > + transfer, word_delay);
> > +
> > + /* Whether the dma transmission is successful or not, dma unmap is
> necessary */
> > + spi_imx_dma_unmap(spi_imx, &spi_imx->dma_data[i]);
> > +
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_dbg(spi_imx->dev, "DMA %d transfer not really finish\n", i);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (int j = 0; j < spi_imx->dma_package_num; j++) {
> > + kfree(spi_imx->dma_data[j].dma_tx_buf);
> > + kfree(spi_imx->dma_data[j].dma_rx_buf);
> > + }
> > + kfree(spi_imx->dma_data);
> > +
> > +fallback_pio:
> > + /* If no any dma package data is transferred, fallback to PIO mode transfer
> */
> > + if ((transfer->error & SPI_TRANS_FAIL_NO_START) && i != 0)
> > + transfer->error &= !SPI_TRANS_FAIL_NO_START;
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
>
> Marc
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
> Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
> Vertretung Nürnberg | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists