linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 21/23] KVM: S390: Remove PGSTE code from linux/s390 mm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251126083818.10107A70-hca@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 09:38:18 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        borntraeger@...ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com, nsg@...ux.ibm.com,
        nrb@...ux.ibm.com, seiden@...ux.ibm.com, gra@...ux.ibm.com,
        schlameuss@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
        gor@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com, gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 21/23] KVM: S390: Remove PGSTE code from linux/s390 mm

On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 08:24:12PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 12:55:52PM +0100, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > Remove the PGSTE config option.
> > Remove all code from linux/s390 mm that involves PGSTEs.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/s390/Kconfig               |   3 -
> >  arch/s390/include/asm/mmu.h     |  13 -
> >  arch/s390/include/asm/page.h    |   4 -
> >  arch/s390/include/asm/pgalloc.h |   4 -
> >  arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h | 121 +----
> >  arch/s390/kvm/dat.h             |   1 +
> >  arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c      |  24 -
> >  arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c          |  24 -
> >  arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c          | 829 +-------------------------------
> >  mm/khugepaged.c                 |   9 -
> >  10 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1015 deletions(-)
> 
> ...
> 
> >  pte_t ptep_modify_prot_start(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> >  			     pte_t *ptep)
> >  {
> > +	preempt_disable();
> > +	return ptep_flush_lazy(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep, 1);
> >  }
> >  
> >  void ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> >  			     pte_t *ptep, pte_t old_pte, pte_t pte)
> >  {
...
> > +	set_pte(ptep, pte);
> > +	preempt_enable();
> >  }
> 
> Why did you add the preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() pair?
> This causes preempt_count overflows.
> 
> See modify_prot_start_ptes() + modify_prot_commit_ptes()...

Ah, I guess this is probably just a rebase error, which by accident
re-introduced the code which was removed with commit 57834ce5a6a4
("s390/mm: Prevent possible preempt_count overflow").