lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251126-blond-bat-of-emphasis-81c0a8@kuoka>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 10:49:22 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: soc: altera: combine Intel's
 SoCFPGA into altera.yaml

On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 07:40:03AM -0600, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> For all SoCFPGA platforms, whether it has the "intel" or "altr" vendor
> prefix are referring to the same business unit that is responsible for
> the platform. Thus, it would make sense to have the device bindings
> documentation in the same location. Move the Intel AgileX board binding
> documentations into the same file that contains the Altera ones.

I had impression that "intel" is the new, thus preferred vendor prefix
and actual owner, so please describe here why this is the other way.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ