[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251126-cautious-eagle-from-sirius-83fe52@kuoka>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 10:53:23 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Shrikant Raskar <raskar.shree97@...il.com>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, dlechner@...libre.com, nuno.sa@...log.com, andy@...nel.org,
heiko@...ech.de, neil.armstrong@...aro.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
david.hunter.linux@...il.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: iio: proximity: Add YAML binding for
RFD77402 ToF sensor
On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 08:44:38AM +0530, Shrikant Raskar wrote:
> The RFD77402 driver has existed without a formal device tree binding
> description. With the recent addition of Device Tree support and
> interrupt handling in the driver, it is now necessary to document
> the DT properties used for configuring the device.
This is all irrelevant here. It does not matter for the bindings if the
driver existed or not.
Please rather document here the hardware.
A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "YAML binding for". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17-rc3/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18
For sure don't use "YAML binding" - there is no such thing.
>
> Since the binding introduces the compatible string "rfdigital,rfd77402",
> the "rfdigital" vendor prefix is also added to vendor-prefixes.yaml.
Also redundant, we can see the diff.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shrikant Raskar <raskar.shree97@...il.com>
> ---
> .../iio/proximity/rfdigital,rfd77402.yaml | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/proximity/rfdigital,rfd77402.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/proximity/rfdigital,rfd77402.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/proximity/rfdigital,rfd77402.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..93deaa4e8b7a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/proximity/rfdigital,rfd77402.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/proximity/rfdigital,rfd77402.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: RF Digital RFD77402 ToF sensor
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Shrikant Raskar <raskar.shree97@...il.com>
> +
> +description: |
Do not need '|' unless you need to preserve formatting.
> + The RF Digital RFD77402 is a Time-of-Flight (ToF) proximity and distance
> + sensor providing up to 200 mm range measurement over an I2C interface.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: rfdigital,rfd77402
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + interrupts:
> + maxItems: 1
> + description: |
Same, also a bit odd wrapping of the text below
> + Generated by the device to announce that a new
> + measurement data is ready in result register.
> +
> + vdd-supply:
> + description: Regulator that provides power to the sensor
> +
> + vddio-supply:
> + description: Regulator providing I/O interface voltage
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
supplies should be required, devices rarely work without power. If you
think hardware works without power, this is something unusual thus you
should explain it in the commit msg.
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> + i2c {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + proximity@4c {
> + compatible = "rfdigital,rfd77402";
> + reg = <0x4c>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio>;
> + interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
Supplies
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists