[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40a34f9d-92d7-433a-b7d7-145f5faaf0a8@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 11:26:58 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, Vincent Mailhol
<mailhol@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next v2] dt-bindings: can: mpfs: document resets
On 21/11/2025 14:42, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>
> The CAN cores on Polarfire SoC both have a reset. The platform firmware
> brings both cores out of reset, but the linux driver must use them
> during normal operation. The resets should have been made required, but
> this is one of the things that can happen when the binding is written
> without driver support.
>
> Fixes: c878d518d7b6 ("dt-bindings: can: mpfs: document the mpfs CAN controller")
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> ---
FWIW, if you insist:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@....qualcomm.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists