[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e48e1918-8ee0-4ffe-93d5-e096af241f77@rock-chips.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 19:51:33 +0800
From: Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.chen@...k-chips.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Chaoyi Chen <kernel@...kyi.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@...il.com>, Luca Ceresoli
<luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner
<heiko@...ech.de>, Sandy Huang <hjc@...k-chips.com>,
Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
Yubing Zhang <yubing.zhang@...k-chips.com>,
Frank Wang <frank.wang@...k-chips.com>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Amit Sunil Dhamne <amitsd@...gle.com>, Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>,
Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>, Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>,
Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] usb: typec: Add notifier functions
On 11/26/2025 7:44 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 11:42:43AM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>> Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 09:46:19AM +0800, Chaoyi Chen kirjoitti:
>>> On 11/25/2025 7:49 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>> +static umode_t typec_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, int n)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + if (is_typec_port(kobj_to_dev(kobj)->parent))
>>>>
>>>> Why look at the parent? Doesn't the device have a type that should show
>>>> this?
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise, looks good to me.
>>>
>>> They have same deivce type "typec_altmode_dev_type".
>>> The parent device has a different device type to distinguish between
>>> port device and partner device.
>>
>> I was already wondering would it make sense to provide separate device
>> types for the port, and also plug, alternate modes, but I'm not sure
>> if that's the right thing to do.
>>
>> There is a plan to register an "altmode" also for the USB4 mode,
>> which of course is not an alternate mode. So USB4 will definitely need a
>> separate device type.
>>
>> So if we supply separate device types for the port, plug and partner
>> alternate modes, we need to supply separate device types for port, plug
>> and partner USB4 mode as well.
>>
>> We certainly can still do that, but I'm just not sure if it makes
>> sense?
>>
>> I'll prepare a new version for this and include a separate patch where
>> instead of defining separate device types for the port and plug
>> alternate modes I'll just supply helpers is_port_alternate_mode() and
>> is_plug_alternate_mode().
>
> That feels like it would be better in the long run as it would be
> easier to "match" on the device type.
>
It make sense. But now can we first use the current "match" device type
operation and then modify them later?
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
>
--
Best,
Chaoyi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists