linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] spi: microchip-core: Refactor FIFO read and write handlers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aSbu4BA8pohsYSQ8@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 14:13:20 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: david laight <david.laight@...box.com>,
	Prajna Rajendra Kumar <prajna.rajendrakumar@...rochip.com>,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] spi: microchip-core: Refactor FIFO read and write
 handlers

On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 12:05:22PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 09:21:45AM +0000, david laight wrote:

...

> > I'm not sure I don't prefer the version with one writeb() call.
> > How about:
> > 		writeb(spi->tx_buf ? *spi->tx_buf++ : 0xaa,
> > 			spi->regs + MCHP_CORESPI_REG_TXDATA);
> 
> Please don't abuse the ternery operator like this, just write normal
> conditional statements.

FWIW, that's what my patch does already :-)

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko