[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0fe4a563da5316ef702d7c324d0820c8c2c224e7.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 09:34:51 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Randy Dunlap
<rdunlap@...radead.org>, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
workflows@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
<rafael@...nel.org>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet
<corbet@....net>, Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>, Lukas Bulwahn
<lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Mathieu
Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] docs: Update documentation to avoid mentioning
of kernel.h
On Wed, 2025-11-26 at 22:46 +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> For several years, and still ongoing, the kernel.h is being split
> to smaller and narrow headers to avoid "including everything" approach
> which is bad in many ways.
And I still think precompiled headers can be beneficial to
standardize using kernel.h to reduce overall compilation time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists