lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251127083111.GY3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 09:31:11 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jianyong Wu <wujianyong@...on.cn>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
	mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jianyong.wu@...look.com, liuyibin@...on.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: avoid calling select_task_rq if bound to one
 CPU for exec

On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 05:04:01PM +0800, Jianyong Wu wrote:

>  kernel/sched/core.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index f754a60de848..c1e9f633cfb0 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -5442,7 +5442,11 @@ void sched_exec(void)
>  	int dest_cpu;
>  
>  	scoped_guard (raw_spinlock_irqsave, &p->pi_lock) {
> -		dest_cpu = p->sched_class->select_task_rq(p, task_cpu(p), WF_EXEC);
> +		if (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1 && !is_migration_disabled(p))
> +			dest_cpu = p->sched_class->select_task_rq(p, task_cpu(p), WF_EXEC);
> +		else
> +			dest_cpu = cpumask_any(p->cpus_ptr);
> +

Instead of duplicating this, could we not just call select_task_rq()
here?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ