[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3cdc6bd6-f0c4-410f-b2a2-8cc2b5d1c522@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 10:46:54 +0100
From: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@...nel.org>
To: Jinhui Guo <guojinhui.liam@...edance.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
rppt@...nel.org, surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, fvdl@...gle.com
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/sparse: Fix sparse_vmemmap_init_nid_early definition
without CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
On 11/27/25 10:25, Jinhui Guo wrote:
> When CONFIG_SPARSEMEM is disabled, the macro
> sparse_vmemmap_init_nid_early(_nid, _use) passes
> two arguments, while the actual function accepts
> only nid. Drop the extra argument _use.
>
> Fixes: d65917c42373 ("mm/sparse: allow for alternate vmemmap section init at boot")
> Signed-off-by: Jinhui Guo <guojinhui.liam@...edance.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 7fb7331c5725..f6dd181a4821 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -2293,7 +2293,7 @@ void sparse_init(void);
> #else
> #define sparse_init() do {} while (0)
> #define sparse_index_init(_sec, _nid) do {} while (0)
> -#define sparse_vmemmap_init_nid_early(_nid, _use) do {} while (0)
> +#define sparse_vmemmap_init_nid_early(_nid) do {} while (0)
> #define sparse_vmemmap_init_nid_late(_nid) do {} while (0)
> #define pfn_in_present_section pfn_valid
> #define subsection_map_init(_pfn, _nr_pages) do {} while (0)
That commit is from early 2025.
So what are the symptoms we are fixing? I would have assumed a
compile-time problem, but no built bot caught that?
--
Cheers
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists